Photo by luc legay.
After a very successful 2011 for Twitter, which saw big booms in its user base,
journalists are looking ahead to what’s in store for the popular social networking service
in 2012.
The SMS giant reported a more than 80 percent increase in the number of registered users
last year, according to PCMag.com, boasting a user base of more than 400 million at the
end of 2011.
And there’s no sign Twitter’s success will slow in this lucky Year of the Dragon.
Twitter currently boasts more than 460 million users, according to statistics gathered by
Mediabistro. Of those users, 127 million are considered active, meaning they log in at
least once a month. Anticipating trends for 2012, Mediabistro estimates the number of
Twitter users will reach half a billion by March of this year, and the number of active
Twitter users will total 250 million by year’s end.
As Twitter’s popularity continues to explode, it’s no wonder that even the most old-
fashioned journalists are considering joining the Twitterverse, in search of new and
effective ways to find stories, connect with sources and keep track of their beats.
Indeed, Twitter is a powerful media tool that can help round out a reporter’s arsenal
of traditional tricks. For example, a journalist can tap into Twitter to find a witness of
a newsworthy event or a person with a particular experience. Or a journalist can use
Twitter to gather ideas and information for stories by crowdsourcing.
But while the Twitterverse offers unprecedented opportunities for reporters to update
their toolbox, it also presents new ethical challenges for upholding journalistic integrity.
Faced with the unfamiliar territory of cyberspace, some journalists may be unclear
about how to apply old journalistic standards to the new media trend of Twitter-based
newsgathering, interviewing and fact-checking.
CIME interviewed Steve Buttry, a leading social journalist and longtime news writer,
about the ethical concerns raised by Twitter journalism. Buttry offered some advice about
how to use Twitter ethically.
According to Buttry, who is also director of community engagement and social media for
Journal Register Company, journalism’s most important tenets should always remain the
same, no matter where they’re put to the test, and that includes the Twitterverse.
“Nothing is more important than accuracy and verification. That doesn’t change with
using Twitter,” Buttry said. “Journalists get deceived by dishonest sources or give undue
credibility to sources who don’t know what they are talking about in in-person interviews
and telephone interviews. And they make those errors on Twitter, too.”
So how can journalists take care to avoid making these errors on Twitter?
Buttry suggests reporters treat Twitter as they would any other form of media, adding that
the same good journalistic sense that is applied to in-person, phone or email reporting
should also be applied to Twitter reporting.
“I like John Paton's rules for employee use of social media,” Buttry said, referring to
the CEO of Digital First Media, which operates Journal Register Company. “John is not
saying that anything goes [for] Digital First journalists using social media, but that we
don't have special rules for social media.”
According to Paton’s philosophy, journalists should use social media in the same ethical
manner they would use any other tool of reportage.
“We don't have rules for use of email, telephone or notebooks. We expect journalists
to identify themselves in any format and to behave honestly and ethically,” Buttry
said. “That doesn't change with Twitter.”
At the heart of behaving honestly and ethically is making the effort to verify every fact,
source and quote gathered in the Twitterverse and to ensure they’re used to honestly,
accurately and fairly to convey the news story at hand.
Though “Twitter presents some challenges to verification,” Buttry said, good journalists
will overcome these challenges and find ways to validate their research, even without
stringent rules and regulations.
“Twitter … presents some great opportunities for verification: the opportunity to ask
questions directly by replying, retweeting, direct-messaging and asking the source to call
you on the phone; sometimes-deep context of previous tweets and their links; bios and
related links; verified accounts; location-enabled tweets,” Buttry added.
While some social journalists like Buttry and Paton advocate giving reporters the trust
and freedom to make their own ethical decisions with regard to Twitter, many news
organizations disagree and choose to regulate reporters’ decision making with policies
and rules.
The Oregonian, for example, issued a controversial Twitter rule late last year, telling its
reporters to view retweets not as quotes, but as endorsements. The Associated Press, too,
has social media guidelines for its employees, which are updated regularly.
The AP’s most recent Social Media Guidelines for AP Employees, revised in January
2012, includes specific Twitter guidelines for issues like following users, deleting tweets,
correcting tweets and retweeting.
While it’s debatable whether guidelines like these are absolutely necessary, they can
surely be helpful in certain situations. For journalists who are new to Twitter, or who feel
uneasy about how to tread the Twitterverse ethically, taking a look at the social media
guidelines of several different news groups can prove useful. Journalists don’t have to
be restricted by the information they find, but they can build their knowledge and arm
themselves with some practical ethical tips.
After all, Twitter isn’t going away any time soon, so the more quickly and effectively
journalists know how to use it, the better the news world will be for it.
